Market Capitalism and Elite Rule
Market populism is the idea that markets within a capitalist
system serve as the best expression of popular will. Supposidly capitalist
markets are democratic institutions that "do what people want." Markets
are not only mediums of distribution and exchange, but mediums of consent
that express the will of the people. Elements of this ideaology have been
around since almost the dawn of capitalism but was only in the later part
of the 20th century that it became dominant in any part of the globe. Today
in the United States this idea is accepted almost unquestioningly by a large
percentage of the population and by nearly all politicians and corporate
media outlets. Market populism serves the interests of the capitalist
class by obscuring class relations and making it seem that control over the
economy is not mainly dominated by a small elite. In this it is rather
similar to electoralism and the idea of a democratic state - it fools the
populace into thinking they are in charge when it actually the corporate
elite that is in charge. Market populism is founded on myths about
how contemporary capitalism works, is contradicted by empirical evidence
and is based on faulty reasoning.
Market populism is premised on the idea that contemporary capitalist
economies are based primarily on a free market or something close to it.
This premise is false; modern capitalism is state-capitalism and
a far cry from the market-dominated system market populists claim we have.
In the most other contemporary capitalist societies the state tramples
on the market in order to protect the interests of major corporations. The
state pours huge amounts of money into the high-tech industry, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals,
agribusiness and many other industries. This includes not only direct
subsidies, which in the US totals almost $200 billion annually, but also the development of new
technologies by the government. In the US, for historical reasons,
this comes primarily through the military and "defense" spending, what is
called "military keynesianism." When profitable technologies come
about as a result of taxpayer funded research it is privatized and the profits
go to corporations. The taxpayers pay for the reasearch, the capitalists
make the profits form it. An example of this is the internet. It
was originally developed by the military, at taxpayer expense, but when
it became profitable the corporations took it over and companies like Microsoft
were able to make a fortune off it. In addition other forms of state intervention (besides enforcing private property,
without which capitalism could not exist) that distort the market to benefit
big business include the Federal Reserve, building & maintaining
large-scale transportation infrastructure and bailouts for failing companies.
This system of state handouts for the rich and market discipline
for everyone else is called free enterprise. Market populism is false
because it pretends that we live in a real free market economy, we do not.
Markets are subverted whenever they might hurt the interests of the
wealthy.
Empirical evidence also refutes the idea that capitalist markets "do
what the people want." The over eight hundred million people who suffer from chronic malnutrition
(despite the fact that there is enough food for everyone) certainly do not
want to go hungry, nor do most people desire this result. The majority
of Americans believe that there is too much violence in the media, yet there
is still lots of violence in the media. This evidence is not limited
to the state-capitalist societies that dominate the world today. The
United States in the late 19th century approximated laisse-faire capitalism
yet there were plenty of economic things which the majority did not like
- child labor, sweatshops, etc. Just because "the market" brings about
certain things does not mean the majority of the population want those things.
According to market populism, "if an industry or an institution is making
a profit, it is satisfying "wants" whose origins and content are deliberately
disregarded. But what we want, what we are capable of wanting is relative
to the forms of social organization." Corporations (and governments)
can manipulate what people want through advertising and manipulating the enviroment.
"People "want" fast food because they have to hurry back to work, because
processed supermarket food doesn't taste much better anyway, because the
nuclear family (for the dwindling minority who have even that to go home
to) is too small and too stressed to sustain much festivity in cooking and
eating -- and so forth. It is only people who can't get what they want who
resign themselves to want more of what they can get. Since we cannot be friends
and lovers, we wail for more candy." (Bob Black)
Most arguements in favor of market populism use some variation of the
Subjective Theory of Value. Supposidly prices are
determined by the marginal utility to the consumer; prices are determined
by "what people want." Corporations attempt to maximize profit by
providing things that people desire and (theoretically) are therefore responsive
to public needs. This idea ignores the large economic inequalities
inherent in capitalism. Corporations attempt to maximize profits by
following the money, they therefore tend to be more responsive towards those
with the most money. There's no point in trying to sell things to
people who have no money; which is why there aren't any marketing campaigns
geared towards the homeless. Companies tend to gear their production
towards those with more money, and in a society where the richest 1% of
the population has more wealth than the bottom 90% this means that individuals
on the top will have much more influence than those on the bottom. If
capitalism means "one dollar, one vote" as many capitalists claim then it
will be those with the most money who will rule. Corporations and states
are also major consumers and these are authoritarian organizations controlled
by a tiny elite - giving that elite even more control over the economy.
In addition, the subjective theory of value is based on circular reasoning.
In order to make the evaluations on how best to maximize their utility
each consumer must know the prices of goods and also what their income will
be. But this data is dependant on the evaluation made by each consumer.
It is thus circular - decisions of the consumers depend on the prices,
prices depend on the decisions of the consumers.
Market populism invents an internally inconsistent fantasy world and then
pretends that the real world has some relationship to it other then that
of contradiction. In real life all capitalist systems are based upon
the rule of a tiny oligarchy, which dominates and exploits the rest of the
population. It is an authoritarian system in which most people have
little say in major decisions.